回到网站

SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY CAR20001

Future Work Skills

· 案例展示

CAR20001 – Assignment 1
SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
CAR20001 – Future Work Skills
Assignment 1 – Employability and Career Development Theory
Word Limit: 500 words (+/- 10%)
Due date: 27 August 2020, by 11:59 pm
Method of submission: Electronically via Canvas
Assessment value: 15% of your total mark
ASSIGNMENT AIMS
The fundamental starting point for any type of career exploration and planning is self-assessment.
Whether you are considering your career direction, choosing options or preparing to compete for
work, your success will depend in part on your self-assessment capabilities. In this assignment, you
will:
1. Demonstrate the ability to use a variety of self-assessment methods, including career
development theories, to reflect on your career development
2. Demonstrate the capacity to apply future work literature to practical career development practices,
such as assessing, planning and describing skills.
RELATED LEARNING OUTCOME
1. Exhibit an understanding of career theory, planning and management.
2. Exhibit a capacity to apply skills that reflects an understanding of current discipline-related skills,
employability skills, labour-market trends and employment opportunities.

WHAT YOU NEED TO PRODUCE
Produce a 500 word fully referenced reflection on your career story. You will use career theory
and My Career Pulse results to explore what matters most to you in your career. You will also
consider becoming part of one of the Drivers of Change in your future career.
1. My Career Story (500 words)
2. VMock registration Screenshot (for bonus points)
This report is to be written in a blend of academic and personal reflection (first person) writing
styles. The report must be original and correctly referenced, including in-text references (APA
or Swinburne Harvard style).

SUMBISSION REQUIREMENTS
Submission of this work will be via Turnitin. The submission portal is located in the Assessments
section of Canvas. Instructions on how to submit the assignment can be found on the Assessments
page on Canvas.
1. Assignment Cover Page
2. Assignment, including Reference list
2
CAR20001 – Assignment 1

MARKING CRITERIA
1. Understanding and addressing the topic - 5 marks
2. Depth of critical self-reflection – 5 marks
3. Written communication and referencing in APA or Swinburne Harvard style – 5 marks
4. Screenshot student dashboard in VMock – 0.5 bonus mark

THE DETAILS
This short assignment will focus on two aspects of the content you have covered so far:
• Career Development DOTS model and Career Theories
• Future Work Skills 2020

Part 1 My Career Story [500 words]
Use 2 of the career theories covered in this unit and your results from the My Career Pulse tool
to write your current career story.
1. Your story should connect what you have done in the past to what you are doing now as
well as your current vision for your future career.
2. Use the career theories to help explain how your interests, strengths and values might
have developed in your life. You may reference any career tests, quizzes or exercises
you have completed provided you include screenshots of results as an appendix.
3. As part of your reflection on your future career, briefly discuss ONE of the six drivers for
change (Fidler, et al., 2011) that interests you and you see yourself becoming part of in
the future. Explain your reasoning.
4. Finally, briefly outline your plans for improving 1 – 2 of your My Career Pulse results
(include a screen shot of the results).
Notes:
1. Only include personal information that is relevant to your career story.
2. Must use at least 5 references. IN-TEXT REFERENCING IS ESSENTIAL.
Refer to rubric below (pp 4- 6) for more guidance.
Part 2 Bonus 0.5 marks for Swinburne VMock Registration
Register yourself on the Swinburne VMock site https://www.vmock.com/swinburne so that you
are prepared for Assessment 3.
1. Include a screenshot of your Swinburne VMock Student Dashboard that shows your
name.
Notes:
1. VMock registration MUST be done using the above link – do NOT use the general VMock
site because you will be asked to pay.
2. You MUST use your student email account when registering.
3. The registration process may take up to 24 hours, so do this early.
4. You will use Swinburne VMock in Assignment 3.
References:
3
CAR20001 – Assignment 1
Davies, A., Fidler, D., Gorbis, M. (2011). Future Work Skills 2020. Institute for the Future.
http://www.iftf.org/futureworkskills/
Fidler, D. (2016). Future Work Skills: Update and Review. Institute for the Future.
http://www.iftf.org/futureskills/
EXTENSIONS
• Extensions for the assignment may be granted in exceptional circumstances.
• Requests for extensions must be directed to the convenor by email.
• All extension requests submitted to the convenor must be submitted before the assignment
due date.
• For all extension requests:
o The request must be accompanied by appropriate documentation (i.e. a medical
certificate for illness, a counsellor’s/psychologist’s letter for psychological issues or
personal circumstances)
o The documentation must indicate the length of time for which the student was
impacted by the illness/circumstance, so that university staff can determine the length
of extension warranted
o Remember that pressure of other work (whether university work or paid work) does
not count as a basis for an extension.
Late Submissions
• Unless an extension has been approved, late submissions will result in a penalty.
• You will be penalised 10% of the assessment’s worth for each calendar day the task is late,
up to a maximum of 5 calendar days.
• After 5 calendar days a zero result will be recorded.
• Late penalties begin to accrue as soon as the due date has passed.
NOTE: It is your responsibility to ensure you have correctly uploaded your
assignment. Files emailed after the deadline will accrue late penalties even if
you attempted to upload. Thus, please check your file was uploaded
successfully.
4
CAR20001 – Assignment 1
Assessment 1 Rubric
Does Not Meet
Standard (N) 0 – 2.4
Meets Standard (P)
2.5 - 3
Meets Standard (C)
3.1 - 4
Above Standard (D)
4.1 – 4.5
Exceeds Standard (HD)
4.6 - 5
Understanding and addressing
the topic
(5 marks)
Did not meet the
criterion.
Some elements of
the requirements are
missing or have not
been developed
adequately.
The personal
reflection is
marginally relevant
or not strongly linked
to career theories, a
self-assessment or
the drivers for
change.
Plans for
improvement are
basic or lacking
detail.
The reflection
demonstrates an
understanding of self
assessment, career
theories and the
drivers for change.
The connections to
the two career
theories and the tools
are somewhat
relevant.
Plans for
improvement are
logical and include
some details for future
actions.
The reflection
demonstrates a
good
understanding of
self-assessment,
career theories and
drivers for change.
Personal insights
were well
connected to the
two theories.
Plans for
improvement are
coherent and
detailed.
The response
demonstrates a critical
understanding of self
assessment in relation
to future work and
career development
using two highly
relevant theories and
personal reflection.
Exhibits a very strong
ability to present
information about
personal career story
in a compelling
manner, including
plans for future
improvement.
Does Not Meet
Standard (N) 0 – 2.4
Meets Standard (P)
2.5 - 3
Meets Standard (C)
3.1 - 4
Above Standard (D)
4.1 – 4.5
Exceeds Standard (HD)
4.6 - 5
Depth of critical self-reflection
(5 marks)
Did not meet the
criterion.
The reflection
demonstrates
some capacity
to make basic
links between
self-assessment
from the unit and
career development.
However, the
reflection requires
The reflection
demonstrates
a capacity to make
clear links between
self-assessment
from the unit and
career development.
The reflection shows
some evidence of
analysis of
The reflection
demonstrates
considerable
capacity to make
connections
between self
assessment
from the unit and
career
development.
The reflection
The reflection
demonstrates
honesty and depth of
thinking, and the links
between self
assessment from the
unit to job readiness.
Reflection shows
insightful analysis of
what is personally
important in their

5
CAR20001 – Assignment 1
evidence of more
analysis of personal
skills and strengths.
what matters in their
career.
demonstrates
an analysis of
what is important in
their career and
presents this in a
convincing manner.
career, presented in a
sophisticated manner.
Does Not Meet
Standard (N) 0 – 2.4
Meets Standard (P)
2.5 - 3
Meets Standard (C)
3.1 - 4
Above Standard (D)
4.1 – 4.5
Exceeds Standard (HD)
4.6 - 5
Written communication and
referencing
(5 marks)
Did not meet the
criterion. Less than
4 references used.
The structure of the
response lacks
cohesion and flow.
Some ideas are not
expressed clearly
and there are some
errors in spelling,
punctuation and
grammar, which do
not impact
significantly on the
major points in the
reflection.
Some additional
editing is required to
ensure the reflection
is presented to a
professional
standard.
Used at least 4
references to
support reflections.
Some sources are
not acknowledged
or are incorrectly
cited. Reference list
is incomplete
The structure could be
better organised in
terms of cohesion and
flow. Ideas are
generally expressed
clearly and spelling,
punctuation errors
and/or problems with
grammar have little
impact on the clarity
of ideas.
Further editing would
enhance the
professional
presentation
of the reflection.
Demonstrated
effective use of at
least 5 relevant
sources to
support reflections.
There are some errors
in adhering to APA or
Swinburne Harvard
style referencing
conventions with only
Well organised
content with any
errors in spelling
and grammatical
construction that
remain do not
detract from the
quality of the
submission.
Demonstrated
highly effective use
of relevant
literature to support
reflections. There
are minimal errors
in adhering to APA
or Swinburne
Harvard style
referencing
conventions with
few issues in-text
and/or in the
reference list.
The response and
reflection are
professionally
presented and obvious
care and attention has
been taken in its
editing and
proofreading.
Demonstrated highly
effective use of
literature to support
reflections and shown
evidence of additional
research.
APA or Swinburne
Harvard style
referencing is
accurate.

6
CAR20001 – Assignment 1
and/or some
references are
incorrectly cited.
minor issues in-text
and/or in the
reference list.
所有文章
×

快要完成了!

我们刚刚发给你了一封邮件。 请点击邮件中的链接确认你的订阅。

好的