SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY CAR20001

Part 2 Bonus 0.5 marks for Swinburne VMock Registration Register yourself on the Swinburne VMock site https://www.vmock.com/swinburne so that you are prepared for Assessment 3. 1. Include a screenshot of your Swinburne VMock Student Dashboard that shows your name. Notes: 1. VMock registration MUST be done using the above link – do NOT use the general VMock site because you will be asked to pay. 2. You MUST use your student email account when registering. 3. The registration process may take up to 24 hours, so do this early. 4. You will use Swinburne VMock in Assignment 3.

References:
3
CAR20001 – Assignment 1
Davies, A., Fidler, D., Gorbis, M. (2011). Future Work Skills 2020. Institute for the Future.
http://www.iftf.org/futureworkskills/
Fidler, D. (2016). Future Work Skills: Update and Review. Institute for the Future.
http://www.iftf.org/futureskills/
EXTENSIONS
• Extensions for the assignment may be granted in exceptional circumstances.
• Requests for extensions must be directed to the convenor by email.
• All extension requests submitted to the convenor must be submitted before the assignment
due date.
• For all extension requests:
o The request must be accompanied by appropriate documentation (i.e. a medical
certificate for illness, a counsellor’s/psychologist’s letter for psychological issues or
personal circumstances)
o The documentation must indicate the length of time for which the student was
impacted by the illness/circumstance, so that university staff can determine the length
of extension warranted
o Remember that pressure of other work (whether university work or paid work) does
not count as a basis for an extension.
Late Submissions
• Unless an extension has been approved, late submissions will result in a penalty.
• You will be penalised 10% of the assessment’s worth for each calendar day the task is late,
up to a maximum of 5 calendar days.
• After 5 calendar days a zero result will be recorded.
• Late penalties begin to accrue as soon as the due date has passed.
NOTE: It is your responsibility to ensure you have correctly uploaded your
assignment. Files emailed after the deadline will accrue late penalties even if
you attempted to upload. Thus, please check your file was uploaded
successfully.
4
CAR20001 – Assignment 1
Assessment 1 Rubric

Does Not Meet Standard (N) 0 – 2.4	Meets Standard (P) 2.5 - 3	Meets Standard (C) 3.1 - 4	Above Standard (D) 4.1 – 4.5	Exceeds Standard (HD) 4.6 - 5
Understanding and addressing the topic (5 marks)	Did not meet the criterion.	Some elements of the requirements are missing or have not been developed adequately. The personal reflection is marginally relevant or not strongly linked to career theories, a self-assessment or the drivers for change. Plans for improvement are basic or lacking detail.	The reflection demonstrates an understanding of self assessment, career theories and the drivers for change. The connections to the two career theories and the tools are somewhat relevant. Plans for improvement are logical and include some details for future actions.	The reflection demonstrates a good understanding of self-assessment, career theories and drivers for change. Personal insights were well connected to the two theories. Plans for improvement are coherent and detailed.	The response demonstrates a critical understanding of self assessment in relation to future work and career development using two highly relevant theories and personal reflection. Exhibits a very strong ability to present information about personal career story in a compelling manner, including plans for future improvement.
Does Not Meet Standard (N) 0 – 2.4	Meets Standard (P) 2.5 - 3	Meets Standard (C) 3.1 - 4	Above Standard (D) 4.1 – 4.5	Exceeds Standard (HD) 4.6 - 5
Depth of critical self-reflection (5 marks)	Did not meet the criterion.	The reflection demonstrates some capacity to make basic links between self-assessment from the unit and career development. However, the reflection requires	The reflection demonstrates a capacity to make clear links between self-assessment from the unit and career development. The reflection shows some evidence of analysis of	The reflection demonstrates considerable capacity to make connections between self assessment from the unit and career development. The reflection	The reflection demonstrates honesty and depth of thinking, and the links between self assessment from the unit to job readiness. Reflection shows insightful analysis of what is personally important in their

5
CAR20001 – Assignment 1

evidence of more analysis of personal skills and strengths.	what matters in their career.	demonstrates an analysis of what is important in their career and presents this in a convincing manner.	career, presented in a sophisticated manner.
Does Not Meet Standard (N) 0 – 2.4	Meets Standard (P) 2.5 - 3	Meets Standard (C) 3.1 - 4	Above Standard (D) 4.1 – 4.5	Exceeds Standard (HD) 4.6 - 5
Written communication and referencing (5 marks)	Did not meet the criterion. Less than 4 references used.	The structure of the response lacks cohesion and flow. Some ideas are not expressed clearly and there are some errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar, which do not impact significantly on the major points in the reflection. Some additional editing is required to ensure the reflection is presented to a professional standard. Used at least 4 references to support reflections. Some sources are not acknowledged or are incorrectly cited. Reference list is incomplete	The structure could be better organised in terms of cohesion and flow. Ideas are generally expressed clearly and spelling, punctuation errors and/or problems with grammar have little impact on the clarity of ideas. Further editing would enhance the professional presentation of the reflection. Demonstrated effective use of at least 5 relevant sources to support reflections. There are some errors in adhering to APA or Swinburne Harvard style referencing conventions with only	Well organised content with any errors in spelling and grammatical construction that remain do not detract from the quality of the submission. Demonstrated highly effective use of relevant literature to support reflections. There are minimal errors in adhering to APA or Swinburne Harvard style referencing conventions with few issues in-text and/or in the reference list.	The response and reflection are professionally presented and obvious care and attention has been taken in its editing and proofreading. Demonstrated highly effective use of literature to support reflections and shown evidence of additional research. APA or Swinburne Harvard style referencing is accurate.

6
CAR20001 – Assignment 1